As current data suggests that DS occurs in 1 out of every 700 or so births, you would think someone would have noticed it before 1858 (perhaps in every culture since the dawn of time). That would be correct. As Down syndrome has been stigmatized and de-stigmatized at several points in human history, the physical evidence is few and far between. However, it is still there.
There are several instances of material evidence from prehistory that experts believe depict Down syndrome. Clay tablets from Babylon dating back to 4000 BC record congenital 'malformations'. Included are 62 human 'malformations' (and associated prophetic relations). There is evidence from the Paleolithic era (18,000 years ago) which may depict Down syndrome or a related condition. Taurodontism has been found in two teeth of this era, which is often associated with chromosomal disorders such as trisomy 21. (Savona-Ventura, ?). A skull from a monastery at Breedon-on-the-hill in North West Leicestershire in England dates to approximately 700-900 AD and is alleged to have numerous features typically seen in individuals with Down syndrome. Among those listed are an overall reduced size, microcephaly, a smaller skull cap, small maxilla, smaller skull length, thin cranial vault bones, smaller face and cheek bones, brachycephaly, thick mandible, mandibular prognathism and irregular tooth development. (Starbuck, 2011).
|Tolteca terracotta figurine|
|Olmec mother holding jaguar child|
The Tumaco-La Tolita culture of Columbia and Ecuador (600 BC to 350 AD) is known for depicting a variety of diseases and ailments in their work. One figurine in particular is suggestive of Down syndrome (Bernal, Brecino, 2006 and Starbuck, 2011) as it depicts a short, obese person with small, up slanted eyes, an open mouth, a small nose with depressed bridge, a small face relative to the rest of the head, a protruding jaw and thickened fingers.
Historical Evidence Potentially Depicting Down syndrome
One of the oldest is a painting from roughly 1505 referred to as "Ecce-homo-scene". It has been put forth that the child depicted in this painting has the characteristics of Down syndrome. The eyes are small and slightly up slanted, the neck is broad, the ears small and low set, the face small compared to the rest of the head, there is a weak nasal bridge, the mouth is open and there is an overall stocky appearance. It could be inferred from this painting that the child is a type of street performer; in fact there is a monkey on a leash which is grooming the child's hair. Sadly, this last aspect would fit with the times. (Starbuck, 2001)
|Virgin and Child with Saints Jerome |
and Louis of Toulouse
|Madonna and Child|
|Virgin and Child|
Also from (approx.) 1460 AD, is a painting entitled Virgin and Child which experts believe to also exhibit characteristics of Down syndrome. Among those listed are: epicanthic folds, oblique eyes, open mouth, protruding tongue, in-curving 5th finger, widely spaced first and second toe, a smaller head, a short, broad neck and hypotonic facial expression.
It has been suggested that the reason for several of his paintings having children with Down syndrome features (while others notably do not) is due to the claim that one of Mantegna's 14 children had Down syndrome and one of his patrons, the Gonzanga family, also had a child with Down syndrome (which reportedly died at four years of age). (Starbuck, 2011)
|The Adoration of the Christ Child|
One of the most famous examples is found in the Flemish painting The Adoration of the Christ Child, created around 1515 by a follower of Jan Joest of Kalkar. There are two individuals in this painting that have strikingly different facial features than the others and it has been argued that they depict people with Down syndrome.
|Detail of The Adoration of the Christ Child|
The first figure is an angel to the right of the Madonna. Unlike the Madonna, the angel figure displays a flatter than normal face, up-slanting narrow eyes, epicanthic folds, flattened nasal bridge, upturned button nose, a downturned mouth and shorter than normal digits.
|Second detail of The Adoration of the |
The second figure is a shepherd boy located in the background. It has very similar features to the previous angel (ie: flatter face, up-slanting narrow eyes, epicanthic folds, a flat nasal bridge, a button nose and a downward turned mouth). This figure however, also has widely spaced eyes and a hypotonic expression on the face. It is to be noted that there is a second "daytime" version of this painting where these characters are more typical looking. (Starbuck, 2001)
It is well known that those with disabilities, both learning and otherwise have been scorned, ridiculed and even regarded as evil throughout the ages. Even Aristotle stated in his Politics: "...as to the exposure and rearing of children, let there be a law that no deformed child shall live." This has persisted right up to modern day and beyond John Langdon Down. With this artistic evidence, it makes one wonder if not everyone felt this way. Aside from the were-jaguars, it is interesting that there are two separate versions of the Adoration of the Christ child and that the infant Jesus was depicted in such a manner. I would like to think that this would suggest that small pockets of free thinkers, small groups of people who were touched by Down syndrome saw beauty, not an abomination. I would like to think that there have been people throughout history that did not fear and despise those that were different, but rather saw them as something special. So much so that they would depict their 'Savior' with those same characteristics.
Bernal, J. E., and I. Briceno, 2006 Genetic and other diseases in the pottery of Tumaco-La Tolita culture in Colombia-Ecuador, Clinical Genetics, 2006
Savona-Ventura, Charles ( ) Historical Perspective Congenital Malformations: a historical perspective in a Mediterranean community
Starbuck, JM, On the Antiquity of Trisomy 21: Moving Towards a Quantitative Diagnosis of Down Syndrome in Historic Material Culture, Journal of Contemporary Anthropology, October 2011